April 28, 2008

April 27, 2008 - Resistance: The work of resurrection - Frank Alton

John 15:1-8, 18-20



MP3 File

How many of you have gone through periods when things in & around your life seem like they will never stop changing? They can be good changes or bad changes. I remember the month I graduated from college my best friend also graduated magna cum laude, and celebrated his 21st birthday, and got married. I was just a tad bit jealous of him, but I also realized that’s a lot of change for one month. I know some of you who have had periods of going back and forth between no work and too much work and back again. Others have gone through a period when people you are very close to keep dying. Still others have the same experience with their own health; first it gets worse, then better, then worse again. Sometimes it happens all at once: you lose your job, then your car gets totaled in an accident; then you need physical therapy but your health insurance went the way of your job.

Jesus’ disciples were going through a period like that. Just a few years earlier Jesus had called them to follow him. Most of them had left their jobs; at the very least they spent less time with their families; they gained a new purpose to their lives; and they were given new focus in their relationship with the world. Now Jesus has gathered them for a last meal together because he senses that the end of his life is near. He knew that his death would create another huge period of change in their lives.

In this morning’s passage, known as the Farewell Discourse for obvious reasons, Jesus was trying to help them prepare for and respond to this giant new change that was about to take place in their lives. At one level change always evokes resistance in human beings. Even when we say we like change, there are elements of resistance that pervade our lives in the midst of big changes. Jesus was very realistic about resistance. He didn’t see it as all bad or as all good. He wasn’t surprised by it, & he didn’t want the disciples to be either. In fact, one could say that responding to resistance is resurrection work. Jesus was preparing the disciples to do that particular part of the work of resurrection.

Today’s passage comes right in the middle of the Farewell Discourse. Both before and after this section Jesus focuses on the sorrow and anxiety that his absence would cause them. But here he focuses on two new realities that would become regular parts of their lives – one internal and one external. He calls the new internal reality pruning: “every branch that bears fruit is pruned to make it bear more fruit.” He calls the new external reality persecution: “If they persecuted me, they will persecute you... Neither pruning nor persecution was completely new to the disciples – they had already experienced both to some extent. But now they were going to be facing them without Jesus being physically present when they happened.

We all have a pretty good idea of what persecution is, whether we’ve experienced it personally or simply read or heard about other people being persecuted; but what about pruning? In horticulture, gardeners know that they have to keep pruning the bush, the rose, the vine, to keep it healthy. You sacrifice twenty potential buds and new shoots in order that the two or three that remain may grow strong and produce much better flowers and fruit than would otherwise have happened. As someone who is not much of a gardener, I find myself resisting the waste of it: all that potential life, all those potential flowers, being ruthlessly cut off.

I find that most of us resist spiritual pruning in the same way. Spiritual pruning involves cutting out some things from our lives which may be good in themselves and which would in principle have had the potential to develop into fruit bearing branches. Pruning also involves cutting out parts that have turned negative even though they might have started out as good or necessary. We no longer need them, and they might be doing us harm. Defense mechanisms are good examples of these. As children we learn ways to cope and survive – like pretending it doesn’t hurt when someone says something hurtful to us. But as we grow up those coping strategies are no longer needed, and if we cling to them, they keep us from the very intimacy to which Jesus invites us. But whether we’re talking about too many good parts or parts that have turned negative because they’re hurting our growth, the pruning-knife cuts them out so that other things may flourish. Pruning is always painful & threatening. That’s why we resist it. When it does happen, it’s important to grieve the losses involved. But Jesus indicates that the vine dresser – the very source of love – is never closer to the vine, never more intimately concerned with it, than when wielding the pruning-knife.

Resistance to pruning is a fact of life. We’re going to resist, whether we like it or not. The challenge is to resist in ever healthier ways. Some unhealthy ways for adults to resist are to deny reality, to blame ourselves or others, and to repress our true emotions because we think they are unacceptable. Once again, those forms of resistance may have been necessary at an earlier stage of life. Children who experienced abuse had to deny reality in order to survive. The psychological term for it is “disassociation.” Sometimes it involves separating “me” from my body. It often leads to repressing the memory of the experience because it is too overwhelming to face at a child’s stage of development. Children don’t decide to disassociate or repress a memory. Their minds and bodies do that by themselves.

But as we grow up, we need to realize that we now can access the psychological and spiritual resources to face the memories. That is how we become more fruitful. Even that doesn’t mean we are necessarily ready today. Healthy resistance for adults sometimes involves postponing pruning until we are in a better emotional space. Even mere acknowledgment that we are resisting can be healthy. Eventually, however, we have to face the pruning-knife.

The distinction between healthy & unhealthy resistance doesn’t only apply to the internal threat of the pruning-knife. It also applies to external threats that evoke resistance. We usually experience as threats any change in the conditions of life, or the expectations that others place on us. The mere anticipation of Jesus’ absence came as a threat to the disciples. But Jesus goes on to speak of persecution. Persecution is a specific kind of external threat that involves opposition – whether physical violence or verbal abuse. It's at least as true in justice-making as in teaching or psychotherapy: the work starts where the resistance starts. If we're not encountering any resistance, then we have to ask ourselves whether we've confused the Gospel of Jesus with our culture's rules for respectability. John's community knew it. Israel's exiles hearing God's prophetic word in Isaiah about their being the vine knew it. The new life that God brings comes in the midst of powers that are hostile to it.

But persecution isn’t the only form of external threat. We also feel threatened when someone tries to impose something on us. When someone tries to get us to accept something we are not ready for, they are imposing their ideas on us. Even a good idea that comes from outside can come at a bad time. Surely you’ve had some one try to give you good advice that simply came at the wrong time? You may even recognize it as good advice; but it infuriates you that they are offering it at that moment. It can be healthy to resist such advice.

That’s why the best therapists are those who understand that each of us have most of the resources we need for our own healing and growth inside us. I believe that’s what Jesus meant when he said, “you have already been pruned by the word that I have spoken to you.” The “word” that Jesus spoke to them mostly came in the form of parables. Parables do not impose ideas. They create space. They invite reflection. They encourage us to access our internal resources.

It may surprise us to call working with our resistance “resurrection work.” In the church I grew up in as a young Christian, Easter and Resurrection were about success. They still are. Having lines out the door to get in to Easter worship; testimonies of success attributed to God in peoples’ lives; everything running smoothly in the church – all those signs of God’s goodness. And they look pretty good to me. But in the Bible, Jesus’ followers experienced resurrection more often as a threat that evokes resistance than a victory that leads to success. Poets like the Guatemalan Julia Esquivel know that. She wrote a poem that became the title of a book called, “Threatened with Resurrection.” She describes the word that has pruned us. According to Julia,
The Word, for our sake, became poverty clothed as the poor who live off the refuse heap. The Word, for our sake, became a sob a thousand times stifled in the immovable mouth of the child who died from hunger. The Word, for our sake, became danger in the anguish of the mother who worries about her child growing into adulthood.The Word cut us deeply in that place of shame: the painful reality of the poor. The Word blew its spirit over the dried bones of the churches, guardians of silence. The Word awoke us from the lethargy which had robbed us of our hope. The Word became a path in the jungle, a decision on the farm, love in women, unity among workers, & a Star for those few who can inspire dreams. The Word became Light, the Word became History, and the Word became Conflict.
Those are parabolic words that allow us to work with our resistance to external threats in healthy ways. Prophetic action is the biblical form that healthy resistance takes. But not everything that goes in the name of prophetic action is healthy. Much so-called prophetic action is reactionary. It hasn’t passed through the pruning process. People talk about counting to ten before acting. Hopefully some of what happens while we are counting to ten is to pay attention to our own pruning and our own resistance, and how the thing we are getting ready to protest is true in our own lives. That doesn’t mean we don’t protest it. Prophets didn’t wait until they had their own lives together before they spoke truth to power. But in their most effective expressions they spoke with a humility that comes from self-reflection.

20 de avril de 2008 - La Resisténcia: El trabajo de Resurrección - Frank Alton



MP3 File

April 20, 2008 - Escape or Entanglement? Two Visions of the Cross - Frank Alton

Acts 7:54-60



MP3 File

I want you to do some musing with me this morning about Immanuel’s ministry. The text we just heard from the Book of Acts is the conclusion of an extended speech given by Stephen, one of the first deacons selected to wait on tables during the distribution of food. Stephen would have been like one of the volunteers in Immanuel’s Food Pantry. That’s an interesting, important & threatening perspective from which to view Immanuel’s ministry. I say threatening because Food Pantry volunteers tend to be people who are full of compassion and not too patient with aspects of institutionalism that might get in the way of compassion.

Too many institutions have failed & too many physical structures have distracted from the real mission of God’s people. That’s what Stephen communicated in his speech. Stephen’s speech debunks any illusion that God will protect institutions or physical structures that get in the way of the Spirit’s mission. Immanuel is currently engaged in conversations and actions that focus a lot on this institution and its buildings in order to sustain Immanuel’s ministry in the years ahead. This passage raises important and uncomfortable questions about all that – questions that we avoid to our peril and engage to our benefit. Stephen incarnated those questions in his speech to the council, and he did not mince words. Of course he was about as well received as Rev Jeremiah Wright would be in the Bush White House. You remember Jeremiah Wright, don’t you? He is the retiring pastor of the Trinity UCC in Chicago who officiated at Barack Obama’s wedding, baptized his children, and shaped his faith. That association has been about as helpful to Barack Obama’s presidential campaign as an association with Stephen would have been to a member of the Sanhedrin.

But we dare not try to escape the likes of Stephen, because to deny a connection with Stephen is to deny the founding story of the church – namely, the life, death and resurrection of Jesus. The parallels with the story of Jesus cannot be missed – from the rage of his enemies, to the forgiveness offered to them, from the covering of the ears to keep from hearing an alternative version of the story to the focus by the victim on the will of God.

What do we need to hear from Stephen at Immanuel at this point in our history? For several years now the leadership of Immanuel has been addressing the matter of the sustainability of this ministry. In the past year the pace of that work has increased. Currently we are engaged in a feasibility study to determine how much money we could raise to restore this beautiful and well used building so that it can continue to be a center of activities for the many communities it serves, including & especially this congregation. We have also been working diligently to develop affordable housing on our parking lots that will both meet a huge need in this community as well as help sustain Immanuel’s ministry financially.

At the same time we continue to nurture relationships with tenants and potential tenants who can share this space in ways that serve the community and share in the expense of our building. A key piece of that strategy involves our efforts to establish a partnership with the Korean Church of Peace, so that after the Open Door Church leaves to their new building next year, we might participate in a ministry among Korean people in this community that is congruent with our own ministry.

Yet another group of Immanuel folks has been looking at all these factors and developing different scenarios for our future. When we put them all together, what options exist for Immanuel? That is a tough question, but it is necessary that we ask it. We are stewards of Immanuel’s ministry. Prior generations established this church, built this space in which we carry out our ministry, and participated in life-giving mission around this city and around the world. We have a responsibility to discern how best to go forward with all that.

What does Stephen’s threatening message have to teach us in the midst of that institutional work? I believe there are several lessons. I want to focus on four: Don’t forget the people. Expect opposition. Keep listening. Practice forgiveness.

Don’t forget the people. Stephen’s sermon was mostly about people. He told the stories of Abraham and Sarah who had to leave the settledness of life in Haran; of Joseph who worked with the Pharaoh of Egypt to save the family that had rejected him; and of Moses and the women who sustained his life when it was threatened. He concludes that those who held the reigns of power, who ran the institutions and inhabited their palaces and temples, were often on the wrong side of history.

What does that mean for Immanuel as we work to sustain our institution and buildings? I want to suggest that it means we dare not focus exclusively on funding this ministry by squeezing every last penny out of our property. We are a congregation that is too small for this building. Look at us. We rattle around in this huge sanctuary. Many of us have arrived at this church wounded from other church experiences. Some of those churches focused a lot on growing in numbers. So most at Immanuel are loathe to do anything that smacks of church growth.

But we have been told by many that Immanuel is one of the best kept secrets in Los Angeles. The truth is there is probably only a small slice of Los Angeles that would be attracted to our ministry. Our model of ministry is threatening to many Christians; and those who want what we offer aren’t expecting to find it in a church. But even a small slice of a city the size of Los Angeles could easily double or triple our numbers. If you have walked or driven around this neighborhood, you see all the new apartment buildings going up. Many new neighbors will be moving in to this area. Will any of them find Immanuel?

I’m not talking about proselytizing people to believe something they don’t want to believe. I’m talking about sharing a specific version of the good news with people who are looking precisely for what we offer. Who will find those people? My sense is that most of us believe someone else will. But I’ve got news for you. There isn’t anyone else. While we strategize about how to get new groups to lease space on our property, Stephen’s message to us is “don’t forget the people.” We also need a strategy to reach the people. We are here to minister to people, not to be landlords. The staff and Session can take care of the landlord part. But all of us need to reach out to and minister to the people. Will you step up to the plate?

The second lesson I see in Stephen’s sermon is “Expect opposition.” Jesus and Stephen are dangerous characters to know. There is no response we can make to Jesus that will protect us from experiencing danger of some kind. If we try to escape the danger by avoiding Jesus, or by hiding from the truth he awakens us to, we will remain locked in fear. Fear leads us to all kinds of dangerous behaviors. If we actively reject or oppose Jesus or his followers, we end up on the wrong side of history, which means the wrong side of justice, compassion & freedom. Stephen was accusing the council of being on the wrong side of history. On the other hand, if, like Stephen, we embrace Jesus and his mission, we expose ourselves to danger from all the forces that feel threatened by the changes Jesus brings into history, all those who oppose the arc of justice. So the best way to move forward is to consciously expect opposition so that it doesn’t discourage us before we build up momentum.

Immanuel has taken positions on many issues that have led people to either actively oppose us or simply avoid us. Some people left when we started having a bilingual service each week. Others left because of our inclusiveness with the GLBT community. Still others oppose our hospitality with undocumented immigrants. We’ve engaged opposing forces in the struggle for affordable housing, better schools for the children of this neighborhood, and a host of other issues. Sometimes I’ve been shocked and discouraged by the opposition. Some days the struggle feels too hard. I want to learn the lesson from Stephen that we need to expect opposition.

Thirdly, we need to keep listening. As the members of the council heard Stephen call them “stiff-necked people, uncircumcised in heart and hears, you are forever opposing the Holy Spirit… they became enraged and ground their teeth at Stephen… he gazed into heaven and saw the glory of God and Jesus standing at the right hand of God. ‘Look’, he said, ‘I see the heavens opened and the Son of Man standing at the right hand of God!’” In response, we are told that “they covered their ears, and with a loud shout all rushed together against him.”

Now the members of the council weren’t evil people. They were like a council of bishops, or like a Presbytery, full of the most committed people among the faithful. They had good intentions & truly wanted to serve God. But they had stopped listening. They had put ministry on auto pilot and moved forward. When they heard something that sounded familiar but that didn’t fit in with their current plans they “covered their ears” in an attempt to avoid the dissonance of the message with their current priorities.

Notice that there are two moments of listening. There is the ongoing listening required to stay attuned to God’s Spirit, so we don’t go astray ever so gradually into ways that make all kinds of sense at each tiny step. Each & every one of us needs to pray, to meditate, and to reflect on our lives on a regular basis so that we don’t get too far off track. But it is practically inevitable that at certain periods we will get off track. That’s when the second moment of listening matters so much. We hear that voice calling to us from a place on the very path from which we have grown distant. Because of the distance the voice sounds discordant. We are tempted to reject it. The challenge is to listen to it, to attend to it, to allow it to break through our resistance and hear its urging to keep taking risks.

The final reminder from Stephen’s story is to practice forgiveness. Like Jesus before him, Stephen prayed that God would forgive his persecutors: “Lord, do not hold this sin against them.” One writer (Gil Bailie, in Girardian Reflections on the Lectionary) pointed out the difference between Jesus and Stephen on the one hand, and John the Baptist on the other. All three were persecuted as innocent victims. Like Jesus, Stephen keeps his eyes on God, so that he can do what needs to be done right there: forgiveness. The only one in the position to forgive is the victim. In going around and forgiving people, Jesus was using his power as the "Lamb slain since the foundation of the world." This is what Andrew McKenna calls the "victim's epistemological privilege." He's the only one with perfect lucidity at this moment. But John the Baptist was glaring back at Herod, his accuser. He was into that little scandal, and nothing would come of it.

Julian of Norwich says this in one of her writings: "God lays upon everyone he longs to bring into his bliss something that is no blame in his sight, but for which they are blamed and despised in this world. Scorned, mocked, and cast out. He does this to offset the harm they should otherwise have from the pomp and vainglory of this earthly life, and to make their road to him easier, and to bring them higher in his joy without end." Being in that position of being the accused, cures us of a lot of our craziness.

So, as we move forward at a critical juncture for Immanuel, Stephen’s words speak important truth into our reality: Don’t forget the people. Expect opposition. Keep listening. Practice forgiveness. We could do a lot worse than remembering those truths. So, “Listen, sisters, brothers, to the news that we proclaim.”

20 de avril de 2008 - Escape o Enredo: Dos Visiones de la Cruz - Frank Alton



MP3 File

April 16, 2008 - Christian stewardship and the environment - Hayward Fong

Genesis 1:1, 27-30; Luke 19:11-27

Next Tuesday has been designated as “Earth Day.” Thirty years ago, we observed “Earth Week.” Like many of our observances, it has been miniaturized in attention and focus.

For a few moments, I would like to reflect on how Christianity has and should play a role in the environment.

Some environmentalists consider Christianity to be a source of the earth’s degradation.

About forty or so years ago, historian Lynn White published a landmark article in which he boldly stated, “We shall continue to have a worsening ecological crisis until we reject the Christian axiom that nature has no reason for existence save to serve man.”

Virginia Vroblesky, in The Gift of Creation: A Discussion Guide on Caring for the Environment (1992), sought to explain Dr. White’s position.

She wrote, “Since Christianity had dominated the West’s world view for at least a thousand year, White concluded that the ‘root’ causes of modern environmental problems were Christianity’s view of the uniqueness of humans (made in the image of God) and the issue of dominion (our role in the natural order). According to White, these two concepts gave us an arrogant attitude towards the earth. People felt that it was a God-given right to rule, and this allowed them to exploit nature as they saw fit.

Dr. White’s view is still alive and well in the ecological debate. Others cite the Western pattern of colonialism - that of conquering, exploiting and moving on - as being a major detriment to the environment as well.

History shows that the Church has not been blameless when it comes to the care and concern for the environment.

William Badke, in his book, Project Earth: Preserving the World God Created (1991), writes, “We have convinced ourselves that people issues are the only important concerns for the Christian. To defend the earth from destruction would be to divert our time and energy away from our God-given mandate to drag human beings out of the jaws of eternal destruction.”

Dr. Badke goes on to say that we have relegated the environment to something we can’t do anything about. So like the moral, ethical degradation of society and the poor, we tend to ignore it, “trusting that salvation will bring economic improvement,” or that Jesus Christ will fix it when he returns.

So what is our responsibility as Christians for the future of this earth?

In Dr. Badke’s opinion, humanity was not created to take advantage of creation, but rather to keep it, nurture it and sustain it: “We were formed in God’s image to represent Him on earth so that all the earth, in turn, could glorify Him better and better.”

The environment is an issue that the Church must not ignore. Many of us know that God gave humanity the job of dressing the earth and keeping it, but how do we accomplish it? How can we even begin to be truly committed to the care and preservation of our earth?

In an attempt to help Christians focus on the environment in its biblical context, let us see what the Bible has to say.

Ms. Vroblesky points out that although much has been written about the environment, “These studies usually begin and end with man - the effects of our presence on the natural world and an exhortation to change. Has this information made a genuine difference in the way we treat the environment.”

The Bible tells us that we have a Creator God, that He does care about the environment, and shows us what our responsibilities toward nature and family are from His point of view.

The biblical definition of a steward is one who looks after and takes care of the possessions of another.

Most Christian authors agree that human beings were put here to be stewards over the physical earth. The concept of stewardship is a most important one.

God did not intend humanity’s time on the earth to be just a temporary layover on its way to the pearly gates. Humanity’s job was - and is - to manage and to take care of what God has given us.

Thus, stewardship, for the Christian, focuses on God’s creation. It encompasses all His gifts, including time, talents, money, earthly opportunities - to name a few. It recognizes responsibility for His world - being proactive in managing the gifts of the Creator.

Our reading from Luke reminds us of this most vividly. Two of the servants managed the money entrusted to them and provided the master with a return. The third put away his talent. This servant did not manage what his master had given him. Rather he ignored his responsibilities. He was an unfaithful steward.

Why has it taken us so long to recognize that our physical environment is crumbling faster than the technicians can reassemble it? Why are we more or less content to watch the world God made turn into a chemical swamp?

Perhaps it’s because we think the problem is too big for us to deal with and that we can’t do anything about it. Perhaps, like the third servant, we don’t want to be bothered.

But like this servant, we also will be judged by what we do with what God has given us.

The environment is an ethical and spiritual issue that should motivate us to prayer, meditation and action. Ecological problems are real and we’re not going to make them go away by consistently ignoring them.

They won’t and can’t fix themselves if we continue to contribute to the problem rather than the solution. Nor can we satisfy ourselves with the standard clichés and platitudes anymore (i.e., Christ will fix it when he returns). Christians must be active and involved.

World crises and problems that command our immediate attention will come and they will go, but acid rain, salinization, pollution of our water ways and the extinction of species will quietly continue.

The trash you see at the street corners eventually ends up in the ocean by way of the storm drains. Many of our communities have taken heed and are doing something about it. Cities have enacted laws controlling litter and trash that eventually end up in the ocean. Heal the Bay mobilizes volunteers to periodically clean up the beaches and waterways that flow into the coastal waters. The hundreds of tons of trash and rubbish these volunteers remove enables God to rehabilitate this watercourse and save His environment. These efforts are good, but it is like placing a Band-Aid to stop a severed artery. We need education and committed Christian stewardship.

13 de avril de 2008 - Evidencias de una iglesia viva - Margarita Reyes



MP3 File

April 13, 2008 - Elizabeth Gibbs Zehnder

Acts 2:42-47



MP3 File

I want to give you some context for today’s scripture reading. Its from the Book of Acts. We understand Acts to have been written by the same author as the Gospel of Luke. In the opening verses of both books the author dedicates the work to Theophilus – “Lover of God” – scholars speculate that this was a believer who wanted to know more about the first hand accounts of Jesus’ life and the life of the early church. In Luke we learn about Jesus’ birth, life, death and resurrection and in Acts we get the next installment about what comes after the resurrection - how a minority religion from a tiny outpost in the empire, crossed the sea to Rome, the capitol.

In the opening chapters of Acts come a flurry of snapshots: I picture the dramatic vignettes rendered by the master oil painters in 16th century Europe

· the disciples huddling to draw lots to decide who to choose to replace Judas
· the Holy Spirit rushing through the house where the disciples have been hiding out and tongues of fire resting on them and then the cacophony as the whole place erupted with languages from around the world,
· Peter's speech to the skeptical crowd, and the turning of their hearts and the explosive growth in the disciples' community.
Then, in today’s reading, we come to this account of life in the early days of the church describing how people who had been drawn to the message that Jesus had carried to the disciples were living. The passage carries a fresh dewy innocence. "they devoted themselves to the apostles teaching and fellowship, to the breaking of bread and the prayers. They were together and had all things in common." This passage is an account of the early, earnest uncertain days after Jesus’ death and resurrection. So many things had been turned upside down, people couldn’t imagine what God would do next.

When I lived in Florida I belonged to a ministry called Single Purpose which was all about faith in action. This passage reminds me of the earnest and dreamy reports that team members would give upon returning home from Single Purpose mission trips. I participated in one such trip to a deaf school in Port au Prince, Haiti. On the trip we had rearranged our selves considerably, leaving behind our suburban north American lifestyle (more or less) and for the 10 days of the trip we ate rice and beans for every meal, took cold water showers, we wore what we thought were more culturally sensitive clothes (looking at the pictures it was an unfortunate combination of madras plaid and peasant dresses)- but all of these “inconveniences” went uncounted, because the joy of what we were doing and sharing with the people that we met was intoxicating.

I would say that today’s reading very closely describes the experience in the community that was created for those 10 days when we lived with the students at the deaf school in Port au Prince.

Now, almost 19 years later, the glow has faded. And when it does – it calls into question the veracity of the experience – was that just a phase? – just my visit-the developing-world-wearing-frumpy-cotton-dresses phase? – or was that the moment watershed moment, walking barefoot on the Haitian beach, when my whole world shifted on its axis and I was awash in freedom to live life in a way that mattered to God?

Coming to this passage so many years after it was written, we push past the words on the page and try to read between the lines – we ask the author in a private whisper, so what are you really saying? To include this description of what the community of faith was like in the early days makes me wonder if this was different that what the community of faith was like for Theophilus and his friends, the first readers of Acts. Were they reading this passage saying – “oh, that’s just like how we do it! That must be why we share everything” ? or were they like us. Hmmm, that’s pretty intense. Nice.

The scene that is described is lovely and it would make a nice painting. And if we want to leave it there we can. But If we are taking the bible as the LIVING word of God, then we need to push past nice art. We need to discern where the invitation for change and growth is. In light of that, we should get our gut reactions out on the table.

One part of us LOVES it. We love the adrenalin rush of the mountain top! We want our life to be saturated with meaning and purpose and purity of intent. We want to be a part of a community where wonders and signs regularly proclaim God’s presence and love, we want to be open and generous with our resources, we want to have a glad and generous heart, we want to be in on such an exciting thing that God would do.

Remember the TV show, Fantasy Island. The premise was that this man Mr. Rourke had the ability to allow people to live out their fantasies. So they would take a little prop plane to his tropical island and he would insert them into a “real life” experience of their fantasy and then at the end of each episode pretty much everyone came out of their fantasy and was glad to go home to real life, with the benefit of insights gleaned from learning that they didn’t really want that fantasy after all.

So if I was going to Fantasy Island, I’d write the check to Mr. Rourke and have him send me into that exquisite moment in time. Set the dial or what ever he did to Acts 2:42-47. Living with the apostles, signs and wonders, sharing what I had, getting what I needed. But then, like everyone who ever went to Fantasy Island, I imagine that I would come to know that its not being born at the wrong time that blocks my membership in the early church, its resistance within me….so here’s something else that I need to put on the table.

When I read this passage, a part of me pulls back.

I like my stuff. I like having control of my resources. 10% tithing is fine, but I resist giving up the other 90%

So, we’ve got some reactions out on the table, let’s check in with the text – what was the author of Acts trying to tell us about the early community of faith? is this meant as descriptive or prescriptive?

Descriptive?

Like a postcard from vacationing grandparents – the weather has been lovely, we visited this church, they have sold their possessions and share the proceeds with the people who need it, they have glad and generous hearts, the church is growing, wish you were here, love gramps and gran.

Descriptive in that this is how they worked it out – loving God, living a life that created space for growth, that gave witness to that love in their life. Descriptive - it's helpful for you to know how someone else did it so you can work it out in your own way.

OR instead of descriptive is this text meant as a prescriptive?

This is how they did it and therefore if you want to be authentic Christians, this is what you should do too. Prescribing a formula: X+Y+share your processions + pray and break bread with hearts full of gladness = authentic Christian community.

This can hook us in a bit, because as North Americans we are charmed with the idea of an authentic original pure experience. We’ll pay a premium for “Heirloom” varieties of tomatoes, jeans that are new, but distressed to appear worn. We think that if we can just get back to the bedrock experience, we can grasp with uncluttered purity the truest essence. We elevate and romanticize the past, thinking we need to check out of who we are in order to get back to who be who we were created to be.

So there’s our tension. We can trust that God created and called us to live in LA in 2008. AND when we read this text we can identify how our experience is different. In that tension is where we can experience the Living in the Bible is the Living word of God. Life, growth, movement are all predicated on tension – tension between what is and what could be, what should be, what might be.

Navigating the tension, navigating the living word of God takes the wisdom of the whole community. For me, the most powerful GPS system is the narratives of the faith community. It’s the stories of our life together that guide us, that remind us of who we are and where we want to go and how to get there.

When we reflect on the past, we can press our hands onto the touchstones of where God has been close as our every breath. I’m sure you each have your own vignettes that pop up in your minds eye – I see the faces aglow in the circle of candles as we gathered at 7th and Berendo to mourn the death of the man who shot. Lucy offering the weary thanksgiving basket team quesadillas giving them energy receive the hungry families who had come, Naomi taking on paramedic when he tried to treat a member of Immanuel like a stray dog. These stories from our past stretch all the way back to the dreamy account in Acts. We too are part of that conversation, we too are a part of that community. These stories guide us and pull and push us along to be the gathered people of God that we aspire to be.

We are not only who we have been in the past, we are also very much in the present. When pause to narrate our present, we have the opportunity to see where we stand. Have you ever caught your reflection and been surprised at what you see. You didn’t know about the brocolli caught in your teeth or hadn’t realized the weight that you’ve lost? The reflection gives us the opportunity to see ourselves from another’s perspective - we gain a sense of where we stand. Narrative theory calls this creating a reflecting surface – laying out the experiences of our present life, and as we narrate them to each other around our community, these stories become a reflecting surface in which we better know who we are.

Again, living things can’t stay locked in the past or frozen in the present, to live means to grow and stretch and change. Yet its when we tell the stories about what is yet to come, we can get a little wacky. Sometimes what we say we want and what we choose in our daily life diverge so significantly that the narrative around the future is just fiction. Yet, narrating what we as a community want the future to hold can move us closer to it being reality.

Now, I have what might be the world’s tightest hip joints. I can wiggle my way into most yoga postures. BUT the ones that require any flexibility in the hip/hamstring area, FORGET it! The instructor will be inviting people to rest their foreheads on the floor and I am just able to get my nose out over my thighs. Keep breathing and hold your intention, the instructor tells me, just by intending to fold my body out over my knees, my hips release a bit. Its like that with our future. If we see that we aren’t living the reality of the Act’s community and we see that that is where God is calling us, then holding that intention can open up all kinds of possible movement. Our intentions are born from the narratives that emerge when we gather to imagine who we are becoming as God’s people. Immanuel, like every faith community that is seeking to live into God’s call, is stretching to understand, to embrace, to be authentic. We are pushing our selves, what does it mean to welcome everyone – not just on paper, but in our life together? So we breath, we hold our intentions and we see where God opens up new possibility, new understanding, in short, new life.

So if the author of Luke and Acts wanted to go for a trilogy, what would get communicated to dear Theophilus about us? Would the description be glowing and dewy? What would an outsider see in us? What do we know to be true about ourselves? What has kept us from being our fullest expression of God’s love?

Its hard work to have these conversations – to share the stories with candor and compassion. And yet, once we have been to the mountaintop, or walked on the beach and felt our world shift on its axis, even when the glow fades, there really is no turning back.

April 9, 2008 - Make any grave images lately? - Hayward Fong

Exodus 20:1, 4-6; Colossians 1:15-20

“You shall have no other gods before me. You shall not make yourself a graven image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth; you shall not bow down to them or serve them: for I the Lord your God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children to the third and the fourth generation of those who hate me, but showing steadfast love to thousands of those who love me and keep my commandments.
It seems this Commandment reveals a brutal nature of the Bible God and makes the Decalogue an instrument of intolerance, persecution, fanaticism and oppression.

How can anyone worship a God who shamelessly expresses his vicious ill will in these words: “For I the Lord your God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me, …”? What a monstrous God of the universe it must be who would make a special Commandment to emphasize his jealous and vindictive nature, and to stipulate the curse he would inflict upon his poor, helpless creatures who fail to worship him!

Since religion fashions its code of conduct upon the morality of its gods, are we to assume that the character of the Bible God is to be emulated?

Are hatred, jealousy and a vindictiveness that punishes the innocent for the wrongs of others the qualities of morality we want to inculcate in our children? Do we want our children to emulate this God, to demand continual supplication and adulation? And failing to receive this worship, are they to live in a state of continual hatred, malice and ill will, with the only purpose of their existence to vent their anger and punish those who refuse to pay homage to their vanity? Or do we want them to grow up into men and women worthy of our efforts to achieve a civilized society with high ethical standards of equality and justice?

We are concerned here not only with the truth of the words of this Commandment, but also with their value in the field of ethics and morals. These Commandments are supposed to be infallible moral guides, and since this one doesn’t appear to possess any intrinsic value in the sphere of ethics or in the realm of morals, why was it made part of the Decalogue? The answer may appear in its elements. It contains four vital features which reveal the character of the Biblical God and follow in perfect continuity the egotistical declaration of the First Commandment. These four provisions are:

1. The nature of the Bible Deity.
2. Strict rules regarding the making and worshiping of images.
3. The penalties provided for disobedience.
4. The rewards to be conferred for observance.
These statements are definite and unequivocal. If the Bible Deity wrote them, did he mean them? And if he meant them, did he follow his instructions and execute his own decisions? If he wrote them and did not mean what he wrote, then he stands convicted of hypocrisy; if he wrote them and cannot fulfill the promises of his obligations and execute the provisions of his own laws, then he stands exposed as a false god!

The description that the God of the Decalogue gives of himself could not be different. His character is typical of the other primitive tribal gods that existed contemporaneously with him. If a god did not possess the ability to punish and reward, of what use was he? Primitive man wanted reward for his labor and punishment for his enemies.

The Hebrew God was created to be feared. If the wrath of a jealous person is feared, how much more terrifying must be the fear of a jealous god. Without this kind of god there could be no doctrine of special providence, and if prayers cannot be directed to a power superior to man, then the whole structure of religion must crumble. Without a god to pray to, and without prayers being “answered,” religion would lose its commodity of trade.

A volume could be written quoting indisputable Biblical passages to testify to the jealous and vindictive nature of the Bible God, but a few quotations and his own words incorporated in this Commandment should be sufficient to silence all doubt as to his reprehensible character. I quote Exodus, Chapter 34, verse 14:

14. …(for you shall worship no other god, for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God),…
Deuteronomy, Chapter 4, verses 23 and 24:
23. Take heed to yourselves, lest you forget the covenant of the Lord your God, which he made with you, and make a graven image in the form of anything, which the Lord your God has forbidden you. 24. For the Lord your God is a devouring fire, a jealous God.
And what more conclusive than the following from Deuteronomy, Chapter 6, verses 13 to 15?

13. You shall fear the Lord your God; you shall serve him, and shall swear by his name. 14. You shall not go after other gods, of the gods of the peoples who are round about you; 15. for the Lord your God in the midst of you is a jealous God; lest the anger of the Lord your God be kindled against you, and he destroy you from off the face of the earth.

Certainly we don’t need any further testimony to prove the character of the Bible God. Even today, clergymen defend this jealous and vindictive nature as part of the true character of the Bible Deity. The Rev. G. Campbell Morgan says: “The severity of the law of God is the necessary sequence of his infinite love.” The Rev. Frederick David Niedermeyer asks:
“Is God still jealous?” and proceeds to answer by quoting him: “For I, the Lord thy God, am a jealous God”! He continues,“Some Christians are ashamed of that declaration. They think it has an undesirable meaning and are sorry that it is included in the Scriptures. Therein they differ from God, for He has freely declared that He is jealous.... In the mind of the Creator there is no hesitancy whatever in proclaiming His jealousy, and He has no dislike for the word. Believers who are ashamed of it do not realize what it means...”
As a result of this Commandment, man’s heart has been hardened and his brain stultified. It has made him vicious and brutal. In his attempt to imitate this Bible God, every conceivable injustice has been perpetrated. The horrors and misery that have followed can never be adequately told. Language is incapable of expressing the tortures endured by the victims of the insanely pious followers of this primitive Bible Deity.

As I said last week, “with God law is the expression of love.” We have to see God’s law with eyes that have seen His love in Jesus Christ. So, how does this Commandment apply to us in this day and age? Most of us, if not all, can sigh with relief and say that at least we haven’t broken this one; we haven’t carved out any graven images lately.

However, before we dismiss this Commandment as having nothing to do with us, we need to take a closer look at ourselves and the society in which we live. Like it or not, we live in a day and age in which image-making has reached new heights unknown to the ancient world. We are the greatest image-makers of all times. It is one of the most lucrative industries, with Madison Avenue as the symbolic center of this art form. Whether you accept this or not, the fact is our society and our lives are filled with images. A few years ago the best selling book was entitled, “Games People Play,” a penetrating look at the many masks we of the modern era wear, and the images which we construct and hide behind like children playing hide and seek. Image-making is a way of life for us.

This is true even in the area of God, for just as primitive man made images of his gods, so we today make our own images of God. We have so many ideas about God; we work away at these thoughts of ours, shaping and molding them as we go along, an idea taken from here and an idea taken from there, until we have carved out an image that fits our fancy. He is everything we ever wanted in a god, the product of our thinking and of our desires. Most often he comes out looking just like us…sharing our ideals, morals, and values. He is literally made in our image, fashioned to fit our needs, our wills, and our ways.

One of the great ironies of the Bible is that while Moses was on top of Mount Horeb those forty days receiving the Commandments from God, the people of Israel were at the base of the mountain busy melting their metal so that they could forge out a Golden Calf. They desired to worship God, as most do, but a god of their own making.

But God will have none of this custom designing of His nature to fit our idea of what God is like. He is intolerant of any attempts by man to fashion for himself an image of God. He reserves the right to reveal His nature to man, for He alone is able to give to the world an image of His nature that is true and authentic.

God has said, “you shall not make for yourself a graven image,” because He knows that any image that is manmade will always be inadequate-often in error and sometimes even evil. Only God Himself can reveal what He is like to man, and this He has done. In Colossians we read that Jesus Christ is the “image of the invisible God.” In Him God became “flesh” and in this way He made Himself visible, “for in him all the fullness of God was pleased to dwell.” Philip said to Jesus, Lord, show us the Father;” Jesus replied, “He that has seen me has seen the Father.”
References: The Holy Bible (RSV);
adapted John H. Stevens “The Fine Art of Living;”
Joseph Lewis, “The Ten Commandments;”
also 092999, 070704.

April 6, 2008 - Communion: Nurturing Subversive Servanthood - Frank Alton

Luke 24:13-35



MP3 File

Where is Karl Rove when you need him? Reading the stories of Jesus’ post resurrection appearances during this year of presidential campaigns makes one wonder who Jesus had for chief political advisor and press secretary. Why weren’t they working on Easter Sunday afternoon to keep Jesus from making such huge mistakes? What, you mean he ran his campaign without professional staff? You mean he tried to defend himself in the court of public opinion by himself? I guess that explains why he failed to bus-in crowds with camera crews, and how he could have chosen two nobodies going nowhere for his debut as risen Lord. How is it even possible that two people – supposedly disciples – who spent all those years with Jesus didn’t even recognize him when he looked at them at such close range? Maybe they were the ones who always sat on the edge at meals, near the door where they could slip outside for a smoke when the discussions got long-winded. Maybe they always walked at a distance from the group, making jokes, muffling their laughter.

What a curious choice for Jesus to appear to such an unlikely pair. But maybe it’s only curious if we assume that the purpose of Jesus’ resurrection was to simply say, “See, I was right. I won.” Jesus had been stripped naked, humiliated, mocked and tortured to death at the hands of a military regime in collusion with corrupt religious authorities. This might seem like an appropriate time for a resurrected revolutionary leader victim to bring the bastards to justice – something a little more along the lines of direct action. Surely that’s what Jesus’ followers would have wanted – to take down the machine, to let the good people win over the bad people.

But that’s not what Jesus was about. Instead he tried to get the two people on the road to see that that whole way of looking at things had to be undone. The mechanisms of division, the self-deceptive and ferocious need to make ourselves out as innocent, the fear of a violent god who demands blood – all of that had to be undone. The One who had loved them so much has come back, not to make his enemies pay, but to love them more. The disciples eventually got it, but only after Jesus broke bread with them. Only then did they realize that as Jesus spoke to them, the truth was burning through and melting their hardened hearts. Jesus spoke the word to them and broke bread with them both so that they could be healed & so that they could be agents of healing for others.

In order for our lives to be healing journeys we need to experience the events of our lives in three distinct moments: in rehearsal and expectation leading up to the event; in present experience at the time of the event; and in remembrance after the event. In the first two moments our understanding is limited by certain factors. In rehearsal, understanding is hindered by an inability to believe that the event will really occur or that it will be so important. At the time of the event, understanding is hindered by the clutter and confusion of so much so fast. But when we experience the event in remembrance, the non seriousness of rehearsal and the busyness of the event give way to recognition, realization, and understanding.

In Luke’s Gospel the disciples experienced communion in all three time zones. Initially Jesus presented it as a foretaste of the Messianic banquet, though that went completely over the heads of the disciples in the moment. Jesus said to them: “I have eagerly desired to eat this Passover with you before I suffer; for I tell you I will not eat it again until it is fulfilled in the reign of God… I tell you I will not drink of the fruit of the vine until the kingdom of God comes & I confer on you a kingdom, so that you may eat and drink at my table in my kingdom.” (Lk. 22:15-16, 18, 29) Instead of pausing to wonder at the image Jesus shared about the future, they argued about which of them was the greatest.

The two disciples also experienced the breaking of bread as a present experience. Despite the clutter and confusion of everything going on in the moment, the two men reach out in hospitality, although their hearts are breaking, spirits flagging, and bodies worn. As Jesus prepares to walk on to his next destination, they invite him to supper. And, in this interplay of call and response, they know him in the breaking of the bread. But they can’t hold on to the Jesus they knew. As soon as they recognize him, he vanishes from their sight. They returned to Jerusalem, the place where the suffering they were trying to avoid was still taking place.

Mystical experiences come and go. Moments of assurance are fleeting. Inspiration is transitory. Health is temporary. But, God is in each detail, filling it with holiness and then moving on the next and inviting us to follow. Faithfulness is in the remembering but also in present movements that create new memories and new possibilities. As the Emmaus story notes, hospitality is the open door to creative transformation and an expanded vision of possibilities.

Finally, the disciples experienced the breaking of bread as remembrance: They said to each other, “Were not our hearts burning within us while he was talking to us on the road, opening the scriptures to us?” What did they remember? In addition to remembering Jesus’ teaching them from the scriptures earlier that afternoon, they were remembering the meal they had shared with Jesus 3 nights earlier in the upper room. Luke’s version of that story puts the argument about “which disciple was to be regarded as the greatest” right smack dab in the middle of the institution of the Supper.

What Cleopas and his partner remembered and maybe understood for the first time when Jesus broke bread with them in Emmaus was that the role of leaders in Jesus’ movement is was that of the servant. Jesus had said, “the leader [must become] like one who serves.” Disciples need to live in a way that subverts the normal order of things. The fact that the moment of recognition that induced memory happened at the breaking of the bread recalls that dispute about greatness. Jesus shouldn’t have been the host at the meal with the disciples. They had invited him to stay. Yet he broke the bread. The communion meal is meant to nourish disciples for this subverted manner of living – to continually feed them with the substance of the One who came to serve.

Communion is an event in three time zones for us as well. We remember “the night in which Jesus was betrayed.” Hopefully we are engaged enough in that memorial moment of worship to allow the Spirit to lead us into some new understanding of God, some new recognition of Jesus’ presence in our world, and some new realization about the way life works. We are also invited to experience the spiritual presence of Jesus at the moment in which we receive the bread and the cup. Chances are, our lives will be cluttered in that moment by worries that we will do something wrong in front of all these people, or spill the juice, or by the distraction of some thing we have to do this afternoon. Yet God can still break through. Finally, we’re reminded in the word proclaimed that this meal is a foretaste of a world in which everyone will be included at the table; in which no one will be treated as a second class citizen in any setting of their lives. But it’s hard to make the connection between something as routine as Holy Communion and something as radical and elusive as universal inclusion.

Yet it is exactly that alternative version of the story that we need to believe and hope for in order to be healed. Cleopas asked Jesus, “Are you the only stranger in Jerusalem who does not know the things that have taken place there in these days?” The irony is palpable only to the reader. Luke is showing us how healing takes place. On the road to Emmaus, two disciples are fleeing the pain of Jesus' execution and the city in which it happened. A stranger approaches and accompanies them along the way. A dialogue ensues over the afternoon and evening that transposes an oppressive story into a liberative one. Far from being the only one who doesn’t know, Jesus was the one who did know exactly how to bring healing alongside the grief of the two disciples.

Healing occurs when those who are oppressed by some power that dominates them find someone to listen to their stories of oppression. When Cleopas called Jesus an ignorant stranger, Jesus didn’t defend himself from the label. Instead he temporarily accepted it in order to evoke their story. First he listened; then he helped them reframe their experience in a way that started to burn through all the layers of grief that were covering their hearts. He showed them that what happened was not a failure – neither theirs nor Jesus’ – but was actually a path of redemption.

At Immanuel we see many people who suffer from that same sense of being beaten down by failure, rejection, low self esteem, loneliness, bitterness and hopelessness. What grieves me as I listen to people is that so many add guilt on top of all that. They feel like they’ve brought it all on themselves. The burden is overwhelming. But as people have a chance to share their version of the story – even when it might be distorted – something begins to shift for them. They become open to hearing another way of looking at their experience, which can be liberating. Over time, and with patient waiting for grace's in-breaking, narratives of oppression, when shared over and over, are often transposed from darkness to light. The purpose is not to talk ourselves & others beyond pain and brokenness, but to understand them in a new way. As one writer put it, “In holy conversation that is convivial and collaborative, the particularity of our oppression stories come to be held in the chalice of a universal story, the sacred story of God's redemptive presence among us.”

This approach to healing is the biblical version of what is known in psychological circles as narrative therapy. It is the way Juan and Gloria work with people in Immanuel’s El Camino counseling center. The narrative therapy movement in which they have received their training was founded by a man named Michael White, who gave a conference in San Diego last week attended by Elizabeth, Judy, Juan, Gloria and Immanuel’s friend, David Marsten. Unfortunately, Michael White got very sick and had to cut the conference short. I learned just yesterday that he actually died this weekend, leaving his followers in shock like Jesus’ followers were so many years ago. But Michael White left a legacy of healing that resonates deeply with Jesus’ own approach to healing; and I am confident that his followers will carry his approach to healing forward just as Jesus’ did.

6 de avril de 2008 - La Comunion: Cultivando una Actitud Subversiva como Siervos - Frank Alton



MP3 File

April 2, 2008 - The first commandment: Demands my all - Hayward Fong

Exodus 20:1-3; John 3:16

If you will recall in my homily the week following Ash Wednesday, I pointed out that if we set out on the Christian way there is a new scale of loyalties. Our relationship to Jesus Christ is a relationship of love and there is a certain exclusiveness in love. When a person begins the Christian way, that person must realize that Jesus Christ must have first place in his or her life. Implicit in that is the following question, “Are you willing to pay the price? What is your share of the cross?” In order to answer it, we need to first ask the question, “What is demanded of me?” Jesus admonished his followers to “Count the cost!”

We have read and heard all too often challenges to our nation’s doctrine of Separation of Church and State. Neoconservatives have pushed to install the Ten Commandments onto public property and have defied court edicts to remove this symbol where installed. It seems ironic that legislators, who have been the loudest in support of having the Ten Commandments in government buildings, when asked if they could recite them, were not able to do so.

This is not to say that being able to recite them is a true test of one’s religious faith; nor is the ability to recite the Bill of Rights or sing our National Anthem a sign of one’s loyalty.

However, I think it is well to look at matters which are the bases of our core beliefs and refresh our thoughts lest they become rusty and no longer useful.

Our Lord recognized the importance of the Commandments and particularly the First Commandment.

There are many attitudes towards the Ten Commandments, most of them hostile. If we were to be open and honest, I suspect that many of us would see the Commandments as the words of a tyrant…harsh laws that place before us an impossible goal of moral perfection.

But is this true…what do the Commandments say to us today? Are they still central to Christian living, despite what the “new moralists” are saying? Are we justified in making them the point at which we try to relate the Gospel of Jesus Christ to the important ethical questions of our day?

Joy Davidman*, the wife of the late C.S. Lewis, writes, “much of the sickness of our age comes of regarding the law as a set of narrow prohibitions instead of a positive command to courageous life and the love of God.” Rather than seeing the Commandments as a negative restraint on life, I hope to be able to show that they set us free to discover the best in life. If taken seriously, they look more like grace than law, more like freedom than bondage. G. Campbell Morgan**, the great Bible scholar, profoundly observed, “…with God, law is the expression of love.”

The Ten Commandments do not allow us to become lost in generalities… they are specific and are personal. Through them we hear the voice of the living God, addressing us in a thoroughly pointed and direct way about the concrete problems of our lives. They are intended to point us constantly towards a pattern of life that is both healthy for ourselves and helpful for the world. The Commandments can become guidelines for the fine art of living, the road map for Christians beyond the Resurrection.

Most people, when they think of the Ten Commandments, think of it as a series of “shalls and shall nots.” It is seldom noted that the Ten Commandments begin with an affirmation of love. Whenever the Jews looked at the Ten Commandments they saw first the Exodus, the symbol of God’s love.
“I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage"(Exodus 20:2).
And so it must be for the Christian community. We too must see God’s law with eyes that have seen His love in Jesus Christ. For us the preamble to the Commandments must always be,

“For God so loved the world that He gave His only Son, that whoever believe in Him should not perish but have eternal life”(John3:16).

With God, the law follows His acts of redemptive love. His love for man is too great to allow Him to send man into the world without His divine guidance and counsel. The law is God’s love expressed in a concrete way, so that man might be tenderly and lovingly led into those patterns of living that result in the fullest realization of life.

The Commandments are a call to restrain the things in our nature which lead to personal destruction rather than joy, to death rather than to life. They are a reminder of a basic truth… that the enemy of life is most often to be found within us. Paul was speaking of this inner evil when he said of his own nature, “I do not understand my own actions. For I do not do what I want, but I do the very thing I hate” (Romans 7:15).

Most of the great evils of the world come from within man, from the outworking of his nature. Jesus said, “For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murders, adultery, fornication, theft, false witness, slander”(Matthew 15:19). Hardly a day goes by that we do not read about people who have lost loved ones through some man made events. Daily drive-by and road-rage shootings in all corners of the Los Angeles area and around the state; and within our memory, the massacre at Virginia Tech University, the Columbine High School in Colorado, the Jewish Care Center in our San Fernando Valley, the hospital in Anaheim, the Wedgewood Baptist Church near Fort Worth; the bombing of the Federal Building in Oklahoma City; the multi-pronged 9/11 terrorist attacks on the Twin Towers in New York, the Pentagon in our nation’s capital; and the high-jacked airliner over Pennsylvania; the terrorist attacks in London, Madrid, Indonesia and other incidents around the world***; the massacre of the little school children two years ago in the Amish community of Nickel Mines, PA. Many of those seeking closure over the loss of loved ones are having to relive the horrors as they are unfolded once again in investigative public hearings.

I can envision many of those who lost loved ones saying. “I am so bitter that my bitterness is destroying me.” And so it will unless it is restrained. It is human for one to be bitter in a great personal loss, but they will only survive if that bitterness is conquered.

A newspaper article following the carnage in 1999 at the Wedgewood Baptist Church demonstrated the spiritual strength of that congregation in dealing with their loss. Over the front door to the church hung a banner: “Let the healing begin.” The funeral service opened with a prayer “…that many may be saved by the lives and deaths of these martyrs.” Their pastor, Al Merideth exhorted his congregation “…to focus on your faith, to get your mind off the pain, and just hang in there. Don’t expend too much energy trying to understand what happened…the other night. Believe that our loved ones are with the Lord today.” The mother of one of the young seminary interns said, “We are not angry and we have peace that God is in control. While she was with us, she was a joy and a delight.”

The Amish people live a very simple life…they do not have electricity, they travel by horse and buggy. Many of the things we consider necessities of life, our radio and television, computer, etc. they have no need. They do not accept outside charity and care for their own. In this instance, however, they have accepted money to pay for the medical care since they do not have insurance. They bore wonderful witness of their Christian faith. In addition to providing immediate care for the families of the victims, they also brought the family of the assailant into the fold of care and requested that money be set up in a fund to care for the widow and children of the man who created the carnage.

The Commandments are a call from God to restrain our natures. Doing what comes naturally is alright for animals, but not for men and women who have been created in the image of God and who are destined in Christ to be sons and daughters of God. They have a living faith to carry them through deep waters of life. Those words and actions from Texas and Nickel Mines demonstrate a people living out their faith in the face of a most personal tragedy.

The first tendency of our human nature which God speaks to is our inclination to turn from the worship of the One true God to the worship of a multitude of false Gods.
“You shall have no other gods before me” (Exodus 20:3).
Our world is filled with gods that beckon to us...that seek our allegiance… that attempt to lure us away from God. God gave man freedom of choice.

There can be no such thing as goodness if we are not free. Goodness lies in the choice between the higher or lower things. Sin is the deliberate action of man in disobedience of God. Man’s perpetual tendency is to move away from God towards the gods of the world. But God will have no part of the drifting…He commands a total loyalty.

God entered the world Himself in the person of Jesus to reveal His nature. When we answer the claim of Jesus, we are answering the claim of God. When Jesus was asked what was the greatest commandment, He said the first: “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind”(Matthew22:37). God will accept nothing less, for He knows what many have yet to learn; that in turning from God we turn from LIFE to death but in turning to God we turn from death to LIFE. Amen.

References: Adapted “The Fine Art of Living;” 092299, 062304, 110806, 041107;

The Holy Bible, (RSV).

*Joy Davidson (1915-1960): A radical Jewish convert to orthodox Christianity; author of “Smoke on the Mountain” and award winning poet, “War Poems of the United Nations;” died of cancer July 13, 1960.

** G. Campbell Morgan (1863-1945): An English Congregational minister who had been rejected by the Methodist Church; colleague of Dwight L. Moody; renowned Bible scholar; from “The Ten Commandments,” ‘The severity of the loving God is the necessary sequence of His infinite love

***Nicholas Berg (Beheaded in Iraq May 11, 2004)
Daniel Pearl (Beheaded in Pakistan 2002)
Pan Am Flt. 103 (Destroyed over Scotland by North African terrorists)
Marine Barracks (Destroyed in Beirut by terrorists)
U.S. Embassy (Destroyed in Kenya by terrorists)
U.S. Embassy (Destroyed in Tanzania by terrorists)
U.S.S. Cole (Attacked in Middle East waters by terrorists)

April 21, 2008

March 30, 2008 - Resurrection: A Non-Violent Way to stop violence - Frank Alton

John 20:19-31



MP3 File

A few weeks ago Judy and I went to San Diego for a surprise birthday party for an old friend who happens to be a former pastor of Immanuel – Gary Wilburn. It was the first time we saw him after he had been diagnosed with ALS – Lou Gehrig’s disease – an illness that one by one unplugs all the body’s energy sources for making our muscles work. Gary’s body looked like that is what was happening. His chest was collapsed, his thin stomach was sagging, and it was hard for him to catch his breath. But I was struck by the continued strength of Gary’s passion for ministry. He had just published his first book entitled The God I don’t believe. Gary couldn’t stop talking about the importance of progressive Christians taking action to counteract damage being done by fundamentalists. Clearly he would agree with a statement I recently heard attributed to theologian John Dominick Crossan. “Remembering that Jesus sits on the right hand of God, if you are looking for God, go find Jesus and keep moving to the left!”

Anyway, back at the party, at one point all the guests sat down so that Gary & his wife Bev could share with us how they were responding to the disease. Gary was hoping to remain strong enough to participate in an experimental treatment that involves placing electrodes on the diaphragm that can be controlled by a small box worn at the waist. The electrodes would be activated by electricity stored in the box, which would cause the diaphragm to contract, which in turn compresses and releases the lungs, which is what happens every time we breathe. The experiment basically consists of plugging a key muscle into a new energy source.

When Jesus walked into the room where the disciples were huddled in fear, grief, confusion, guilt and anger, he found them afflicted with a spiritual version of Lou Gehrig’s disease: all their spiritual muscles had been unplugged because of the debilitating emotions they felt as a result of the threat the crucifixion signaled for their own lives. In the dark, confusing days immediately following Jesus' execution at the hands of Roman soldiers & the instigation of the Judean authorities, they were probably asking themselves, "how long do you think we can last?" William Sloan Coffin might have said to them what he said to his own congregation: “The primary religious task these days is to try to think straight… You can’t think straight with a heart full of fear, for fear seeks safety, not truth. If your heart’s a stone, you can’t have decent thoughts – either about personal relations or about international ones. A heart full of love, on the other hand, has a limbering effect on the mind.” (Quoted on UCC lectionary webpage for this Sunday) The disciples were seeking safety, and the truth came instead. The truth empowered them to love.

The disciples weren’t only seeking safety because of fear. They were also incredibly sad for the loss not only of their teacher and leader but of their hopes for the salvation from God that they had come to expect. “Why would God let this happen?” The feelings of guilt must also have been tremendous. They had all run away, abandoned their teacher at his hour of greatest need. On top of all that, they must have felt overwhelming anger that might have bubbled up into conflicts among themselves. Novelist Walter Wangerin imagines a scene in which James and Peter are about to physically pounce on each other over an argument right at the moment that Jesus appeared. So what did Jesus do when he arrived on that scene? He breathed on them, and spoke the words, “Peace be with you.” He plugged them into a new energy source: “Receive the Holy Spirit.” That is John’s version of Pentecost; & it happened in the evening after the morning of the empty tomb.

Heidi Neumark is a Lutheran pastor who wrote a book entitled Breathing Spaces while she was pastoring a church in the Bronx. I remember meeting Heidi early in her ministry when Judy and I were visiting some friends who are also Lutheran pastors ministering in the Bronx. Heidi describes the connection between spirituality & breathing in a graphic way. “Those who study the science of breath emphasize the importance of breathing from the diaphragm rather than the chest. Shallow, rapid chest breathing is related to our fight or flight response. Slow, deep breathing from the diaphragm channels fresh, energizing oxygen into the far recesses of the lungs, the blossoming tips of each branch of the bronchial tree, called alveoli.”

Then she gets personal: “My alveoli were not flowering as they should. I felt short of breath, my throat clenched, the tracheal trunk clogged and shrunk. It is a feeling that I get in certain dreams: I am stuck in a tight space, with a small hole out of which I must climb, but I can’t get through. Fear plunders the thinning air. I was crying easily, losing patience with the children, having no resistance, walking around without skin, lost to myself.” But then she did something important: she asked herself what was going on. “Was this the beginning of burnout? It might have been, but it wasn’t. It was the beginning of this book. Writing would keep me from going over the edge again. Writing became a door to contemplation and a channel for grief.” (p 97-98)

Jesus helps the disciples make the same connection between the need for healing on the one hand, and the need to express ones vocation on the other. He repeats the words, “Peace be with you. The first time is about healing their wounds by showing them his. The second time is about calling forth their vocation by adding, “as God sent me so I send you. Receive the Holy Spirit.”

The connection is deep. It was no coincidence that Heidi wrote a book out of her own need for healing. It was tied intimately into who she was. Likewise, the followers of Jesus received a calling that emerged directly from their own need for the healing power of forgiveness that had been accomplished in the resurrection. So their commission was, “If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven them; if you retain the sins of any, they are retained.”

Rowan Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury, stated this clearly: "There is no hope of understanding the Resurrection outside the process of renewing humanity in forgiveness. We are all agreed that the empty tomb proves nothing. We need to add that no amount of apparitions, however well authenticated, would mean anything either, apart from the testimony of forgiven lives communicating forgiveness." At least for the disciples, the resurrection was an experience of forgiveness. They had abandoned Jesus, becoming complicit with his murderers. The fact that the resurrection was happening to them was an experience of forgiveness for them that became a vocation of forgiveness.

Jesus’ followers are given wisdom, energy, creativity and authority to enact resurrection in acts of healing, wholeness and transformation. Sometimes this can take the form or convicting our nation and its values and leadership for our violence & our disregard of poverty, starvation, global warming, and economic uncertainty. At other times it will mean standing for life as “God-breathers” in our world, exhaling hope, spiritual vitality, and relational healing. (Bruce Epperly, Process and Faith Lectionary Studies) Wendell Berry says we are called to practice resurrection by breathing God’s presence – embracing and sharing it with the life-giving power of the Easter Christ.

The actual word of peace Jesus probably spoke to them was “shalom.” That beautiful Hebrew word incorporates peace, healing, justice and forgiveness – precisely what Jesus had shown them both in his life and in his death. But it was so far outside what they knew that they couldn’t see what was right in front of them. The resurrection was about to open their eyes. Resurrection is God’s assurance that shalom is God’s way in the world. The cross as a repulsive execution brings us face to face with the fact that our cure for violence is sacred violence – a violence we say is O.K. for the sake of keeping order. Jesus had to be executed because he was disturbing the peace. A very common view of the Gospel is precisely this: Jesus’ death confirms that sometimes sacred violence or holy war needs to be carried out in order to overcome violence. But that is exactly the wrong message, and it is critical that Christians who understand that communicate the liberating truth of shalom.

The true impact of the resurrection of the one executed is to put us face to face with the realization that the only way to ultimately cure violence is to completely refrain from doing it, even if it means submitting to it. Submitting to it demonstrates its meaninglessness while the resurrection reveals the Creator’s power of life. (Paul Neuchterlein) But resurrection also plugs us into the power to actually live that way. The same message comes out of an interfaith conversation I have participated in between Muslims, Jews and Christians called the Abrahamic Faiths Peace Initiative. The document makes the connection between peace and the crucifixion: “The crucifixion of Jesus is a story of love overcoming hate, of compassion transforming vengeance. It is not a story about passivity. Jesus’ death bears witness to the fact that God’s response to violence is active nonviolence. Jesus refused to retaliate, but spoke words of compassion and forgiveness to the very persons who crucified him: ‘Abba, forgive them. They don’t know what they are doing.’” (Lk 23:24). (AFPI)

This leads us to the final part of today’s passage: where was Thomas? Usually the focus of the sermon after Easter is on the one known as “doubting Thomas.” But many have recently pointed out that Thomas’ doubts may reveal a contrasting spirituality more than a spiritual deficit. Wherever Thomas may have been the first time Jesus appeared to the disciples, he was at least not “locked for fear of the Jews” like the others. Could he have been out doing what Jesus commissioned the fearful disciples to do: go out into the world and forgive as he does? What about Jesus’ question: “Have you believed because you have seen me?” Maybe Thomas’ biggest mistake is in thinking that the body he wants and needs to touch, the body of the risen Christ, is the body that had been nailed to the cross. But it's not like that. If Thomas was out in the world, he was in precisely the place Jesus wanted him to be.

Like the apostles, we are being sent out into the world, and specifically to the world’s brokenness, because we are the Body of Christ, Jesus’ presence at work in the world. If we want to experience that, we’ll have to leave the rooms we lock ourselves in because of fear. When we try to sequester ourselves and our children away from the world's pain, we are hiding both from ourselves and from Christ's presence. Fortunately, Jesus keeps after us, breathing peace and power to drop the masks, unlock the doors, and go out and touch the places where the Body of Christ is still suffering. More than 38 million people infected with HIV. One in five people in the world try to live on less than a dollar a day. One person in seven tries to stay alive without access to clean water. Everyone tries to stay alive in South Los Angeles. (Sarah Dylan).

Each of us has a part. None of us can solve the whole mess. But the more of us who can allow our vocation to be the exhale after Jesus breathes healing forgiveness into us, the more healing will be released into the world.

30 de marzo de 2008 -Resurrección: Una manera no violenta - Frank Alton

Audio solamente.



MP3 File

March 26, 2008 - Living and loving by dining with outcasts - Hayward Fong

Psalm 51:15-17, Luke 5:27-32

Luke opens this lesson with the call of Matthew, a social outcast, by Jesus. Of all people in Palestine the tax collectors were the most hated. Palestine was a country subject to the Romans; tax collectors had taken service under the Roman government; therefore they were regarded as renegades and traitors. A term we used in World War II was “Quislings” referring to the Prime Minister of Norway who became a Nazi puppet.

The taxation system lent itself to abuse. The Roman custom had been to farm out the taxes. They assessed a district at a certain figure and then sold the right to collect that figure to the highest bidder. So long as the buyer handed over the assessed figure at the end of the year he was entitled to retain whatever he could extract from the people; and since there were no newspapers, radios or television, and no ways of making public announcements that would reach everyone, the common people had no real idea of what they had to pay.

This particular system had led to such gross abuses that by the New Testament times it had been discontinued. There were, however, still taxes to be paid, still Quisling tax collectors working with the Romans, and still abuses and exploitation.

There were two types of taxes. First, there were stated taxes. There was a poll tax which all men from ages 14 to 65, and all women from 12 to 65, had to pay simply for the privilege of existing. There was a ground tax which consisted of one-tenth of all grain grown, and one-fifth of all wine and oil. This could be paid in kind, or converted into money. There was income tax, which was one-percent, of a man’s income. In these taxes there was not a great deal of room for extortion.

Second, there were all kinds of duties. A tax was payable for using the main roads, the harbors, the markets. A tax was payable on a cart, on each wheel, and on the animal which pulled it. There was a purchase tax on certain articles, and there export and import duties. A tax collector could stop a man on the road, have him unpack his cargo and charge him whatever he felt like charging him. If the man could not pay, sometimes, the tax collector would offer to lend him money at exorbitant rate of interest and so get him further into his clutches.

Our elected officials must have learned well in Sunday school when you see all the charges on our utility bills, charges couched in terms that defy explanation.

We have seen the power of greed in recent days with the real estate meltdown, corporate giants disappearing from Wall Street, public corruption at all levels of government, loan sharks preying on people least able to defend themselves

In Jesus’ time robbers, murderers and tax collectors were classed together. A tax collector was barred from the synagogue. A Roman writer tells us that he once saw a monument to an honest tax collector. An honest specimen of this renegade profession was so rare that he received a monument.

Yet Jesus chose Matthew the tax collector to be an apostle.

(1) The first thing Matthew did was to invite Jesus to a feast, which he could well afford, and to invite his fellow tax collectors and their outcast friends to meet him. Matthew’s first instinct was to share the wonder he had found. John Wesley, founder of the Methodist Church, once said, “No one ever went to heaven alone; he must either find friends or make them.” It is a Christian duty to share the blessedness that we have found.
(2) The scribes and Pharisees objected. The Pharisees, the separated ones, would not even let the skirt of their robes touch the like of Matthew. Jesus made the perfect answer. The philosopher Epictetus called his teaching, “the medicine of salvation.” Jesus pointed out that it is only sick people who need doctors; and people like Matthew and his friends were the very people who needed him most. It would be well if we were to regard the sinner not as a criminal but as a sick man; and if we were to look on the man who has made a mistake not as someone deserving contempt and condemnation but as someone needing love and help to find the right way.
Three weeks ago, I shared with you some thoughts from Henri Nouwen’s Lenten booklet, “Called to Life, Called to Love,” leaving you with a closing reminder that God never gives up loving us so we should never give us on ourselves.

One thing we know for sure about God. He is a God of the living, not of the dead. God is life. God is love. God is beauty. God is goodness. God is truth. God doesn’t want us to die. God wants us to live. Our God, who loves us from eternity to eternity, wants to give us life for eternity.

When that eternal life was interrupted by our unwillingness to give our full “yes” to God’s love, He sent Jesus to be with us and to say that great “yes” in our name and thus restore us to eternal life. So we should have no fear of exclusion or death. There is no cruel boss, or vengeful enemy, or cruel tyrant waiting to destroy us—only a loving, always forgiving God, eager to welcome us home.

God’s love for us is everlasting, it existed before we were born and will exist after we have died. It is an eternal love in which we are embraced. Living a spiritual life calls us to claim that eternal love for ourselves so that we can live our temporal loves—for parents, brothers, sisters, teachers, friends, spouses, off-springs and all people who become part of our lives—as reflections of God’s eternal love. No fathers or mothers can love their children perfectly. No husbands or wives can love each other with unlimited love. There is no human love that is not broken somewhere. No human love is the perfect love our hearts desire, and sometimes human love is so imperfect that we can hardly recognize it as love.

When our broken love is the only love we can have, we are easily thrown into despair, but when we can live our broken love as a partial reflection of God’s perfect, unconditional love, we can forgive one another and enjoy together the love we have to offer. We must trust that the source of all love is God’s unlimited love, and that this love is not far away from us but is the gift of God’s Spirit dwelling within us.

This gift of God is one of the treasures of faith for us here and now. It calls for patience. Patience is a hard discipline. It is not just waiting until something happens over which we have no control such as the arrival of the bus, the end of the rain, the return of a friend, the resolution of a conflict. Patience is not a waiting passively until someone else does something. Patience asks us to live the moment to the fullest, to be completely present to the moment, to taste the here and now, to be where we are. When we are impatient, we try to get away from where we are. We behave as if the real thing will happen tomorrow, later and somewhere else. We need to be patient and trust that this treasure of faith, God’s love, is right here where we are and to live in it to its fullest.

PRAYER: O God, we thank you for your gift of unconditional love. Help us not to demand of others the perfect love they cannot give. As you live in eternity, help us to live graciously in the here and now in profound gratitude for the eternal life you have prepared for us. Amen.

March 23, 2008 - Resurrection as peace and promise - Frank Alton

Jeremiah 31:1-6; Matthew 28:1-10

So did you notice how quickly Easter arrived this year? I read in the newspaper lately that Easter can only ever come one day earlier than it has this year. I didn’t really need the newspaper to tell me that. When Ash Wednesday comes on February 6, church staff doesn’t have much time to slouch after Christmas.

The wide range of dates for Easter offers a great symbol for the way life usually works out. As Christians we celebrate Holy Week & Easter as a central part of Jesus’ story. Christians believe Jesus revealed God to us more clearly than anyone else ever has. We also believe Jesus revealed a way of being human that is worthy of imitation. The fact that Jesus was executed, and then raised to life becomes the center piece of a new way of looking at all of life.

Life is full of little deaths and resurrections. Losing a job, losing a home – whether to eviction or foreclosure, losing a loved one, losing a court case, losing a relationship – these are just some of the little deaths we face constantly. Resurrection doesn’t always come into our life experience when we want it. We can’t make it happen simply by wanting it, or whenever we think we need it. Resurrection is something God does. The good news is both that God can make resurrection happen, and that God is good so God does make resurrection happen. The bad news is that both its timing and the form it takes are out of our control. I know some of you who wish that weren’t the case, or at least that God would hurry up.

But the real challenge is to recognize and respond to signs of new life when they do show up. We often fail to notice when new life has already arrived. Not everyone in the Gospel story recognized the risen Jesus. Today’s Gospel passage gives us some clues about how to recognize the resurrected Jesus. Maybe if we can learn how to recognize Jesus’ resurrection we can get some handles on all the other signs of new life we need to see as well.

When the day began, the main “event” had already happened. Jesus had already been raised when the curtain comes up on the Easter story. What the Gospel stories show us is how people reacted to what they saw. In Matthew’s version, the soldiers guarding the tomb saw an angel who rolled back the stone. They reacted with fear. The angel didn’t even address them. Then there were the women who had come to anoint Jesus’ body for burial. The angel did speak to them: “Don’t be afraid; Jesus isn’t here; for he has been raised. Come & see, then go tell his disciples he has been raised from the dead and is going ahead of you to Galilee; there you will see him.”

Matthew then tells us that the women left quickly with fear & great joy, & ran to tell Jesus’ disciples. They acted on the word they received. As soon as they did Jesus interrupted their journey, revealed himself to them and they recognized him. They stopped to worship him, and then Jesus repeated in more personal terms the message of the angel: “Don’t be afraid; go tell my brothers to go to Galilee; there they will see me.” We then learn that the 11disciples who had been hiding in fear also responded to the word they heard – in this case through the women. They went to the mountain in Galilee where they were instructed to go, and there they saw Jesus.

The disciples finally stopped wallowing in the past and acted in hope. Every single one of them had failed to grasp the significance of what was going on. Until they received the word of hope from the women that if they went to Galilee they would see Jesus they remained locked in fear and hiding. But hearing an instruction that made sense in a strange sort of way lifted them out of their funk and they acted. Acting in hope, or acting on an instruction by Jesus, is exactly what people who were healed throughout the gospels did. A bleeding woman risked the wrath of her community by acting in hope that an iterant healer named Jesus might finally heal her. The man born blind acted on Jesus’ instruction to go and wash off the mud Jesus had applied to his eyes & returned seeing. The paralytic and his friends acted in hope by making a hole in the roof to gain access to Jesus.

According to Matthew’s Gospel, action always accompanies the recognition that resurrection & new life are happening. We have to stop clinging to a dead past and act on a possible future. That is not always easy. The past often looks better than the future. The new life itself doesn’t require our action; but recognizing it does. Our action doesn’t bring about resurrection – that is still in God’s hands – but it does seem to be a necessary part of our recognizing it.

But is there really any other way to view life & death? In fact, there is. We can see it in terms of survival. If we believe life is good, but don’t believe in resurrection, then our best option is to cling to the life we have to make it last as long as possible. If survival is the name of the game, risk is to be avoided at all costs. If we’re honest we will admit that sometimes all of us allow the survival mode to take over our thinking. Who hasn’t clung to something of the past beyond the moment when the time had come to let go? Who hasn’t resisted some change that will affect our life in ways we can’t fully determine? Who hasn’t felt the fear of losing a home, a job, a financial cushion, wondering how those losses will be restored? Especially in these times of economic uncertainty, increasing violence, political change & a war that is draining our best resources, it’s tempting to focus on survival.

I am always encouraged when the Immanuel community gathers to tell stories about their lives. Each time, people bear testimony to God’s faithfulness in bringing new life, even in the midst of the worst circumstances. Last Thursday evening at our Maundy Thursday service each dramatic story was followed by an equally or more dramatic story. Yet each account of pain was accompanied by an acknowledgement of God’s faithfulness – through the Immanuel community, through family members, or through some other event or person that was recognized as God’s intervention.

This past week Barack Obama gave a speech about racism in America that many have called historic. I hope all of you have listened to it. Mr. Obama spoke some painful truth to the nation, something that many political advisors to presidential candidates would have called political suicide. The question remains how the nation will respond. The front page of this morning’s LA Times featured an article entitled, “Talking about race…um, you first.” What that fails to recognize is that Mr. Obama already went first. Wouldn’t it be great if people of faith – people who believe in resurrection – went next? We have every reason to take the first step in talking about race, because we believe in the Reign of God, the New Creation, in which people of all races, economic and educational levels, sexual orientations, nationality, migratory status, age and gender we have equal voice. Do we dare join the women at the empty tomb – in our personal, community and public lives? That is the invitation to us on this Easter morn.